Photo Credit: Carlos Carbagal
|
Lee Harvey Roswell
Born: June 13th, 1974 in Cortland, NY
Education: Self-taught
Teaching: None
Awards: None
Commercial clients: None
Exhibitions:
2005 |
ArtPrint.Com
Grand Opening,
Canvas Gallery, SF |
|
Lee Harvey Roswell's The Red Paintings (13 Interpretations of Goya),
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
Wet Paint, Another Day in the Life of a Painting,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
3rd Annual Erotic Show,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
A Day in the Life of a Painting,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
Cine Delirio,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
2004 |
Solo Show,
Element Lounge, SF |
|
Thee Erotic Gunn Show,
Pawnbroker Gallery, SF |
|
Solo Show,
Idle Hand Tatto Studio, SF |
|
Tokyo Monster Show,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
2nd Annual Erotic Show,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
Lee Harvey Roswell vs, Marco Almera,
Shooting
Gallery, SF |
|
2003 |
The Gun Show,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
The Erotic Show,
Shooting Gallery, SF |
|
Doctrine,
Lola Gallery, SF |
|
The Propaganda Show,
Startsoma, SF |
|
Balazo Group Show,
Balazo Gallery SF |
|
Artist's statement:
You all know the Shakespearian line, "Nothing will come of
nothing," right? A deceptive, seemingly simple line really. "Nothing
will come of nothing," sure! This is King Lear replying to his
daughter, Cordelia's refusal to add pomp to her affections for Lear.
But in this first scene of the play, Lear is also introducing himself
as a fool, because of course a great deal comes about from that first
'nothing'. A wake of human drama, disinheritance, deception and
seduction, greed and revenge, madness, and death lies within those
pages as proof. So, "nothing will come of nothing" has an alchemical
esotery to it.
To me, this makes a fine analogy for the tradition of painting. In
painting you have a canvas or panel or whatever surface you are
working with. From the point of visual intrigue or physiology,
nothing. Then the painter takes his paints and oils and various
mediums, and through a process of hand to eye prowess he covers that
surface. But again, physiologically, spiritually speaking, the painter
has only covered nothing with nothing. And this, my friends, is where
I introduce my attitude toward aesthetics and craftsmanship. I've
watched painters haphazardly spill their paints, splatter them around,
make great messes, and still end up with nothing more than nothing.
However, a skilled hand attached to the right nervous system can
elevate the very same materials, the very same nothing, to the
loftiest heights of human revelation. He can create images that bring
our great philosophical obsessions out into the stark light of
observation. . . and all out of nothing!
In painting I am not interested in abstract art, or sentimental
art, or childish art, or political art, or pop icons, or graffitti
art, or post-Picasso laziness, or what you watched on television when
you were a kid, or any other such bullshit. None of that matters to
me. Without the least hint of apology I tell you, to me it's nothing.
Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. No, in painting I am
interested in exactly this: the fantastic images that are there to be
culled forth from the immensely fertile depths of the creative,
neurotic-like mind. Images rendered with as much care, competence, and
craftsmanship as possible for a precise, concrete representation of
the treasures brought up from those paranoiac depths. Sacred or
profane, these images assure endlessly new, and enigmatic objects and
landscapes reflecting all the seductive, terrifying elements of
existence. The inarguable forerunner of the senses is the eye. We are
primarily an optically reliant species. So, as pictorial illusionists
transforming nothing into artifacts of spiritual sustenance, I'm
holding the painter up, not just as an admirable tradesman, but much
much more. He resides as a high-priest over that all-devouring human
reality, a conducting channel through which nothing triumphantly
becomes something.
-LHR, 07.21.05, SF
|